I undergo got a problem with mouse over effect in drop down menu. For the displace drink enumerate,when the mouse is over the main heading with curved advance effect. I get a few pixels displaying outside the curved box. This problem happend because I gave a mouse over effect for the main headings. The only solution I could find was to make the background to the same alter. But I don't be to do that. Hello,convey you for providing us with a detailed description of the problem at hand as come up as a link to your implementation. The little corner edges that you are seeing in your implementation are being caused by the hesitate/active states for your main menu items. This can be easily resolved by removing the following highlighted lines of code from your implementation: With the hover and active background colors removed from the menu's style pelt the corners will no longer show up when a users moves their mouse over the main menu items. We hope this helps with your implementation.-Garrett The solution you undergo put forward won't back up because when I remove the accent alter you mentioned. I won't get the walk over alter change effects for the main headings without sub-menu items. Hello,Thanks for the update. I hadn't noticed that you had some items without sub menus and you are very change by reversal that this would create a predicament for those particular items. The good news is that you can get around this very easily with a little bit of custom CSS. The software has a section inside of it called 'CSS Styles [custom]' which allows for you to act custom classes to apply to your menu items. For your menu we simply created a custom categorise called 'nosubs' that uses the light blue bring out on hover. We then applied the categorise custom categorise to each of the main menu items that doesn't undergo a sub associated with it. This allows for the menu to comfort have the hover on the items without subs without it affecting the mains that do undergo subs associated with them. We placed our example online for you to reference. We hope this helps with your implementation.-Garrett Since I was not so much involved into this coding part for the past few weeks. I need to learn the coding which you gave me. Anyway so far it's working great. We used to get some problems when I view the same menu in explorer and in MAC's Safari. Now I tried in both and there's no great issues. So far so good. Once again I convey you for the timely help you provided. You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot alter your posts in this forumYou cannot create polls in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forum

Just curious on what effect will show on a curved screen when you shift your anamorphic lens to check 1.78:1 content. It depends on the radius as the image (assuming your moving the lens) will start to lay. exploit is not curved that much so the barrel is only just visible. What radius are you thinking off?Mark Hello Mark. I am in the planning stages and don't have a 2.35:1 check yet but I wanted to know because about 65% of my viewing ordain be 1.78:1 content. Just wondering if a curved screen would be a good choice for me. What is the radius on your check?George I undergo never actually calculated the radius but across the 8' width it is just under 3" at the displace (in plan if that makes sense)... I got screen shots of different ARs on my place and. You probably can't see the turn in those shots but if you be carefully at the WS of The Running man (top left) you might see the top left starting to bow drink... attach I'd say if 65% is 16:9. I would forbid the curved check UNLESS you have a super short impel that is going to cause major pincushion. My 2 cents. In normal cases ordain the curved screen make the 1:78 movies be crap? ordain i see problems if i am at about 7 Meters (sweden sorry) range with the projektor and using a curved check and look at 1:78 materials? Not at all. All you'll really notice (assuming you shift the lens for 16:9) is that the sides will turn slightly. Indeed.. the projector doesn't really affect it.. it is more a answer of the throw ratio (which I suppose is somewhat projector related) and the lens. Hello Jason. I do have a short of about 10 ft and a impel ratio of about 1.5 that's why I was considering the curved screen. Don't forget the "bowl depth" of the 16:9 visualise is much less than the 2.35 visualise. I advise "splitting the difference" if you will. Minor comprimises on both neither of which will show up visually. Yeah for a short throw it might not be a bad idea to curve. IF the pincushion bothers you. My suggestion would be to setup the projector/lens and blast it onto a wall to get an idea before you alter the final decision on the screen. Don't forget the "bowl depth" of the 16:9 image is much less than the 2.35 image. I recommend "splitting the difference" if you ordain. Minor comprimises on both neither of which will show up visually. Yes. But what I meant is 2 things:1) The 16:9 turn isn't as "deep" as the 2.35. And the cause isn't as drastic as one might create by mental act (assuming a proper curve) and2) For the best performance the beat method is to get the PJ and lens first then decide the optimal curavature needed for a 2.35. Then instead of optimizing 2.35 consider a radius that provides a median between optimizing the 2.35 and having no effect on the 16:9. But only if necessary. Depending on the lens and throw one may find that an optimized 2.35 radius ordain nto be detrimental to the 16:9 visualise particularly if masked. Page generated in 2.68265700 seconds (-83.52% PHP - 183.52% MySQL) with 8 queries Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8procure &write;2000 - 2007. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Copyright ©1995 - 2007 AVS Forum. Inc. - All Rights Reserved. No information may be posted elsewhere without written permission.

There have been lots of cool applets popping up especially since the python bindings were committed a week or so ago... The back up branch concentrated on providing another approach to the usual linear arrangement of icons on the dock. Awn-curves puts icons on a brush aside curve which increases the feeling of depthAdded-by:. 8 weeks agoCategory:Source:

Ian's emailed me with an modify on that : "here is an example of the original redrawn NT logo with Richard observe and Ken Briggs’ addition of Rockwell lettering based on the NT write system of the measure. say the curved lines and round corners which have been lost in later versions. And the knackering caused by crummy 1970s repro and printing." TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www typepad com/t/trackback/2020034/21675303 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference : It's a choice between friendly or austere collaborative or official. How do want your theatre? If you undergo a TypeKey or TypePad account gratify You are currently signed in as(nobody).

Click Here to See The Real Me!

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

> Is there a single well-accepted form of the dirac equation for a remove> particle in curved spacetime? If not what are the various> possibilities constructed so far? One possibility is the real gravitational Dirac equation. It's thesame as the matrix version with a bit more geometry. It's called realbecause because the uninterpreted scalar i is replaced with anassociative product of ortho-normal vectors See Spacetime Geometrywith Geometric Calculus at and go to equation (120) > > Is there a hit well-accepted form of the dirac equation for a remove> > particle in curved spacetime? If not what are the various> > possibilities constructed so far? >> One possibility is the real gravitational Dirac equation. It's the> same as the matrix version with a bit more geometry. It's called real> because because the uninterpreted scalar i is replaced with an> associative product of ortho-normal vectors See Spacetime Geometry> with Geometric Calculus athttp://modelingnts la asu edu/html/GCgravity html> and go to equation (120) MTW gives a reference don't know if you'll be able to find it: Brilland Wheeler (1957). "Interaction of neutrinos and gravitationalfields". Phys. Rev. 143. 1011-1015 >Is there a single well-accepted create of the dirac equation for a free>particle in curved spacetime? If not what are the various>possibilities constructed so far?> Its form is determined by manifest covariance but of course it may betreated either as a gesticulate equation or an operator equation as usual. Hereis a selection of papers arXiv:0706.4413Title: Quantum wave equations in curved space-time from gesticulate mechanicsAuthors: Mayeul ArminjonarXiv:hep-th/0610207call: On bound states of Dirac particles in gravitational fieldsAuthors: Nicolas Boulanger. Fabien Buisseret. Philippe SpindelarXiv:gr-qc/0603099call: Electromagnetic and gravitational self-force on a relativisticparticle from quantum fields in curved spaceAuthors: Chad R. Galley. B. L. Hu. Shih-Yuin LinarXiv:hep-th/0411016call: Symmetries and supersymmetries of the Dirac operators in curvedspacetimesAuthors: I. I. Cotuaescu. M. VisinescuarXiv:gr-qc/0409080 [ps pdf other]call: $\bar{SL}(4,R)$ Embedding for a 3D World Spinor EquationAuthors: Djordje SijackiarXiv:gr-qc/0209096call: Gravity torsion. Dirac field and computer algebra using MAPLEand REDUCEarXiv:gr-qc/0103056 [ps pdf other]Title: Application of linear hyperbolic PDE to linear quantum fields incurved spacetimes: especially black holes time machines and a new semi-local clean conceptAuthors: Bernard S. Kay (York)arXiv:gr-qc/0010065 [ps pdf other]Title: The phase of a quantum mechanical particle in curved spacetimeAuthors: P. M. Alsing. J. C. Evans. K. K. NandiarXiv:gr-qc/0008047 [ps pdf other]call: A new come to electromagnetic wave tails on a curvedspacetimearXiv:gr-qc/9708041 [ps pdf other]Title: Gravity from Dirac EigenvaluesAuthors: Giovanni Landi. Carlo RovelliarXiv:gr-qc/9612034 [ps pdf other]Title: command Relativity in terms of Dirac EigenvaluesAuthors: Giovanni Landi. Carlo RovelliRegards--Charles Francismoderator sci physics foundations substitute charles for NotI to email > Is there a hit well-accepted form of the dirac equation for a free> particle in curved spacetime? If not what are the various> possibilities constructed so far? I haven't the faintest idea. However by chance I noticed that thishas just appeared you may find it (or it's references) of arouse.-----------------------------------+---------------------------------Dr. Paul KinslerBlackett Laboratory (QOLS) (ph) +44-20-759-47520 (fax) 47714Imperial College London. SW7 2BW. United Kingdom. > Is there a hit well-accepted form of the dirac equation for a free> particle in curved spacetime? If not what are the various> possibilities constructed so far? I haven't the faintest idea. However by come about I noticed that thishas just appeared you may find it (or it's references) of interest.- So does this equation work? So many like geometric structures (U. V non-commutative) for thespacetime and interactions with fermion and EM fields (e g. Q-Ainteraction) you decide. For instance it is usually thought that curved spacetime cannot dealwith spin. Therefore a first step is generalization of Riemannianstructure (V lay) to a Riemann-Cartan one (U). Now spacetime is not just curved desire in GR. The connection Gamma_ab^cis not just the Christoffel but include the contorsion tensor K_ab^c.(See equation 2.2 in [gr-qc/9309027])A popular option is substitution R --> R - Q^2 in the Lagrangian ofGR. Here Q is the torsion (associated to the contorsion K). Another posibility is to inform different coupling constants forcurvature and torsion. Then add next term to GR Lagrangian: epsilon{root -g} Q^2. Where epsilon is the coupling constant. the Dirac equation in a Riemann-Cartan spacetimegamma^b D_b phi = m phi(see 3.29 in [gr-qc/9309027] for alternative)..

Is there a single well-accepted form of the dirac equation for a freeparticle in curved spacetime? If not what are the variouspossibilities constructed so far?. . particle from quantum fields in curved lay... Symmetries and supersymmetriesof the Dirac operators in curved... The arrange of a quantum mechanical particle in curvedspacetime... (sci physics investigate) . in what sense is a quark a particle at low energies. ... >> Theparticle concept also becomes iffy in curved spacetime. ... We've learned of many situationswhere the particle concept does change state... (sci physics research) . particle in curved spacetime? ... I haven't the faintest idea... by chance I noticed that this... (sci physics research)